01 July 2009

Ten years of Scottish devolution

Posted by Scottish Unionist at 4:10 PM. There are 12 comments.
Notwithstanding my light blogging, the tenth anniversary of the opening of the Scottish Parliament warrants acknowledgement, and these remarks strike me as particularly insightful and apposite:

HM The Queen, addressing MSPs: “Over this last decade members of the Scottish Parliament past and present have worked hard to address the issues of real importance to the Scottish people and have firmly embedded it as an institution at the heart of Scottish life and culture. Your challenge over the coming years is to take the Scottish Parliament forward on the next stage of this journey. To build upon those firm foundations to ensure it continues to reflect the priorities and aspirations of all of Scotland’s people and to retain the public’s confidence and trust.”

Gordon Brown: “Devolution is not, and must never be, a staging post to separation but a reasonable rebalancing of powers and responsibilities - to serve the people of Scotland better and secure its position in a stronger, more prosperous and fairer United Kingdom.”

Annabel Goldie: “Ten years after the opening of the Scottish Parliament, the hearts and minds of Scotland are firmly rooted in devolution and solidly behind Scotland’s place in the United Kingdom.”

Jim Murphy: “We can maintain Scottishness in Britain and Britain gives us the opportunity to be more Scottish. Scots want identity not isolation. Being in Britain allows us to be Scottish. Frankly, we have the best of both worlds. The advantages of devolved government but the invaluable insurance policy of being part of a larger social and economic union - the United Kingdom.”

Alan Cochrane: “Mr Murphy’s speech yesterday - one of the best this observer has heard on the subject - sought to up the ante, bring us back to basics and remind us what the argument is about. It is about who we are. We are Scots AND Brits; Brits AND Scots. That is by far the preferred option of the majority of the population and being patriotic about Scotland does not preclude support for the maintenance of Scotland within the UK.”

Ross Finnie: “In 1999 the Scottish Parliament opened with a high level of public interest and anticipation. There were, of course, the cynics who predicted the parliament would not be up to the job because they alleged it had very limited powers. They were wrong. Any objective assessment of the first 10 years will reveal that mistakes were made but, over the piece, the Scottish Parliament has made a real difference to people’s lives...”

Magnus Linklater: “The idea that devolution would lead to separatism and the break-up of Britain has been put on hold. What Tam Dalyell, the anti-devolution former Labour MP, once called “a motorway without exits to independence” has turned out to be a route liberally supplied with slip roads to all sorts of other constitutional options.”

Iain Gray: “The task given to the Scots of the beginning of the eighteenth century was to make the loss of a Parliament the springboard for a century of progress which shaped their world. Our task at the start of the twenty first is to make our new parliament the springboard for a century of progress which shapes our world for the better. To accept any lesser ambition for our devolved parliament is to let down those whose voices and values echo through it. To use it as an excuse to look in upon ourselves and to hell with our neighbours is to ignore the example they gave us of how to look outwards to the world and its challenges.”
12 comments
  1. Indy July 1, 2009 5:39 PM  

    Jim Murphy's comments just confirm for me that unionists are way more obsessed with identity than nationalists are.

    It's quite bizarre.

    'Scots want identity not isolation'.

    Er, people living in Scotland already have an identity, thanks very much! They don't need to be given one! (Though thankfully we won't be having to carry compulsory ID cards to prove our identity).

    Then he goes on to say ‘Being in Britain allows us to be Scottish.’

    What does that mean? Does it mean that Britain allows Scottish people to be Scottish? Gee, thanks! Or does it mean that it is being in Britain that allows us to be Scottish i.e. that Scottishness is somehow dependent on being in Britain?

    Or is he just talking nonsense?

    I dare say that SU will reply that his comments are over my head.They would be over anybody's head because they don't make sense.

    If what he was trying to say is that devolution has given people a greater sense of national identity I don't think that is the case. I don't think people have any more or less sense of being Scottish now than they did 20 years ago. What has changed is the political context.

  2. Wardog July 1, 2009 9:09 PM  
    This comment has been removed by the author.
  3. Observer July 1, 2009 9:13 PM  

    I like this quote from Iain Macwhirter (who is not a nationalist) who says '' Constitutional reform was primarily about restoring the sovereign right of the Scottish people to choose how they are governed, but it was also about breaking the Westminster monopoly of power, about bringing politics closer to the people, creating a legislative space for new ideas''.

    Now maybe the Scottish people will decide that they still want areas of governance reserved to Westminster; and maybe they won't.

    As the tenth Anniversary of devolution sees *all* parties in agreement that the constitutional settlement needs to be re-visited, with further economic power and responsibility being transferred to Holyrood, I think it would be a hasty man indeed that would assume that the journey is somehow ended.

    And the direction of travel is towards independence, no one is seriously advocating going back.

  4. Scottish Unionist July 2, 2009 1:16 PM  

    Indy:

    “Being in Britain allows us to be Scottish.”

    I think he was saying that, contrary to what some people evidently imagine, being part of Britain in no way suppresses our Scottish identity. I would also venture to suggest that being part of the UK in fact amplifies Scottish identity, because asserting it takes on a broader and richer form.

    Wardog:

    Yap away; nobody’s listening. Oh, and please stop spamming me daily with emails “inviting” me to “contribute” to your new blog. There’s a good pup!

    Observer

    Re: “the direction of travel is towards independence”.

    That’s a fallacy. Federalism (the unionist model which is closest to outright independence) and separatism itself represent entirely distinct perspectives.

  5. Wardog July 2, 2009 10:03 PM  
    This comment has been removed by the author.
  6. Andrew BOD July 3, 2009 12:35 AM  

    Wardog

    Fortunately, others are listening. I've encountered this 'Springer' poster too. I would call him a cyberunionist, but that would be too complimentary.

    SU, perhaps you could include him alongside one of your dignitaries at the beginning of this blog, just to give a true reflection of unionist opinion out there. You've done it many times with so-called 'cybernats' and it would add a bit of balance to your blog.

  7. Wardog July 3, 2009 8:59 AM  
    This comment has been removed by the author.
  8. Wardog July 3, 2009 9:04 AM  
    This comment has been removed by the author.
  9. Stonemason. July 3, 2009 3:21 PM  

    Well done Scottish Unionist .....

    ..... you have reduced the dog of war to a pooch in paranoia.


    The pup has been reduced to continuous fallacious argument, you seem to have won the argument north of the border. It was when I read "'double speak' and 'forked tongue'" I guessed there was a flea just above his tail, he couldn't quite reach it.


    The Nationalists are loosing in Wales too, outed as the party of the past, shown to be lacking.

  10. Wardog July 4, 2009 8:31 AM  
    This comment has been removed by the author.
  11. Scottish Unionist July 4, 2009 9:27 AM  

    If a majority of the Scottish electorate ever voted for independence then the Union should not be maintained “at all costs”. And under such circumstances I would be deeply disappointed but by no means “uncomfortable”. So count me in the 46%. It's a meaningless survey.

  12. Indy July 5, 2009 10:25 AM  

    The nationalists aren't losing in Scotland Stonemason.

    We won both the Scottish Parliament elections in 2007 and the European elections this year. Unless you count winning national elections as losing that's a somewhat strange analysis.